Infrastructure as code
- Terraform
- Pulumi
- Ansible
Cloud platform
Platform work from the shape of the cluster to the pipeline that puts code in front of users, with the rollback path exercised rather than assumed.
Production clusters, release pipelines, and the discipline around them: rollbacks, observability, cost control. Cluster topology is sized against the load the product actually sees rather than a reference diagram. Namespaces, quotas, and network boundaries are set once and described in code, so the next change is a review instead of an excavation.
Environments described in code and releases that stop being events. Repeatable delivery instead of remembered steps. Every environment is reproducible from the repository, every change arrives through a pipeline that can be read, and every deploy has a rollback that has been run at least once before it was needed.
A read of where the cloud bill actually goes, where the platform is fragile, and what to fix in which order. Capacity is sized against measured load, and the invoice is broken down by service and by cause before anything is switched off.
Product teams running on cloud without a platform team of their own, and teams where every deploy still depends on the person who knows the sequence.
Work starts wherever the pressure already is: a cluster nobody can reason about, a deploy nobody wants to run on a Friday, or an invoice that has outgrown the traffic behind it.
The form takes three answers. What comes back within 48 hours is a written read of the platform: where the spend concentrates, what fails first, and the order to fix it in. No call is required to receive it.
The request is on its way to CloudWarrior. Written findings follow within 48 hours of it landing.
No further step is needed.
Scripts are off, so this form cannot hand the request on. The same three answers work as plain mail: address, company, and what is going wrong right now. Write to pat@cloudwarrior.io.
Or write straight to pat@cloudwarrior.io.
Bench open · Remote across the EU